Both teams to score?
reads official full-time result
1.9xAsk anything about a match that the official result can answer, and mutuel turns it into a table anyone can back. Share the link wherever your people are. They bet against each other, not against a bookmaker, and 3% of everything that lands in the pot is yours.
Prototype · simulated pots · no real money at risk
Closes the week above its Monday open?
Every one of these is a question somebody asked, and 3% of each pot goes back to them. Drop a loose one and let the crowd pin it down: anybody can bolt a detail onto your table, they keep 1% of what their detail gathers and you keep 2% on top of your own 3%. The thinner the side, the more it pays. Real fixtures and real question types; the pots and the results on this prototype are simulated.
Every table you opened and every detail you bolted onto someone else's, with what each one has gathered and what comes back to you. Your cut runs whichever way the match goes.
Same match, same pot, two completely different jobs. One of them is right or wrong at full time. The other one gets paid at full time.
Your return depends on the result.
Your return depends on how many turn up.
| On a 4,000 USDG pot | If YES wins | If NO wins |
|---|---|---|
| A backer with 100 on YES | 156.00 | 0.00 |
| You, who asked the question | 120.00 | 120.00 |
The result moves one of those rows and not the other. That is the whole reason to be on the second one.
The table is yours from the moment you ask the question, and you never take a side of it. Whoever is right on the pitch, your cut comes off the pot the same. Leave the question loose and the crowd will pin it down for you, and every detail they add pays you too.
Two pots go in. One pot comes out, split by what each winner put in. Nobody sets a price, nobody takes a margin, and the only cut is the 3% that goes to you.
Drag the pot your table draws, and drag how lopsided it ends up. One of those changes what your backers get. The other is the only one that changes what you get, and it is not the lopsided one.
Your 3% comes off the pot before the winning side splits the rest, so the result is not your risk. You are paid for the question, not for being right about it.
Six places to look and twenty-nine sub-questions under them, from the scoreline down to how many shots on target one side puts away. Anything binary that the official result answers, with a kick-off and one read. Nothing subjective gets on the board. The narrower you make it, the thinner the side it creates, the longer the price on that side, and the bigger the pot your 3% comes off.
reads official full-time result
1.9xreads official goal count
2.0xreads official match stats
3.3xreads official match report
4.1xreads official match stats
28xNo vibes, no "was that a penalty", no committee. If the official result does not already say it, the table cannot settle it.
One contract holds every table. It knows two timestamps, the close you set and the final whistle, and after the second one anybody can put the result up against a bond, anybody can dispute it by matching that bond, and an unchallenged result stands. Then the winning side and your 3% are both there to be withdrawn. No admin key can reach a staked token; the worst anyone with the keys can do is stop new tables opening.
The table settles on the official full-time result. A goal in the 94th minute is the result, and the read waits for it.
If either side is empty at the close there is nobody to pay and nobody to pay from, so the table voids and everybody is refunded in full, with no 3% to anyone. A postponed match refunds the same way, and so does a result nobody ever put up.
The creator picks the close, anywhere from an hour before kick-off to the whistle itself, and never after it. The gap between that timestamp and the read is the security model: nobody bets once the match is under way, and nobody bets on a result already known.